> Achieve (H)ome /access keys on this page are indicated by a letter in parentheses, e.g. (h)
CONTENTS [skip]





Part 4 - Policy and Legal Framework for Using the Code
4.1 Status of People with Impairments in
(E)ducation
4.2Identifying and
(R)emoving Barriers to Education
4.3(P)olicy Framework for Tertiary Education Providers
4.4(L)egal Framework for Tertiary Education Providers

Part 5 - (A)ppendices

Kia Ōrite Achieving Equity
Part 4 - THE POLICY AND LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR USING THE CODE OF PRACTICE

This section provides an overview of the status of people with impairments in tertiary education, the barriers to participation and achievement that many face, and the policy and legal framework for using the Code of Practice.

For consistency of language throughout this document, we continue to use 'people or students with impairments'. The documents referred to in this section use a mixture of 'people with disabilities' and 'disabled people'.

4.1  The Status of People with Impairments in New Zealand [15], [16], [17], [18], [19]

[next - 4.2]   [previous - 3.13]   [contents]

People with impairments are under-represented in tertiary education and over-represented in low socioeconomic groups. Thirty-nine percent of adults with impairments have no educational qualification, compared with 24 percent of those adults without impairments. More than half (56 percent) of all people with impairments have gross personal incomes of less than $15,000.

In 2001, Statistics New Zealand found that there were fewer people with impairments with school or post-school qualifications, compared to the general population.

Educational Outcomes for People Over 15 years of age
  1. Highest qualification - school:
    1. People with impairments, 34%
    2. People without impairments, 42%
  2. Highest qualification - post school:
    1. People with impairments, 27%
    2. People without impairments, 34%

In 1998 the Ministry of Health reported that people with impairments who require intensive assistance on a daily basis were:

In 1998, government introduced Special Supplementary Grants, which are paid to Tertiary Education Institutions (universities, polytechnics, colleges of education and wananga), to contribute to support for tertiary students with impairments with high support costs.

The Special Supplementary Grant has contributed to a significant increase in the number of students with impairments participating in tertiary education.

The number of students with impairments has grown from 7,700 (excluding private providers) in 1998 to 19,200 including private providers in 2002.[20] In recent years the number of students with impairments has been growing between 20% and 25% a year, and in 2002 represented 4.5% of all students, up from 2.8% in 1998. However, the rate of participation by people with impairments (at 2.3% in 2001) is estimated to be less than a quarter of the participation rate for those without impairments (at 16.7% in 2001).[21]

It is widely recognised that the lower level of successful participation by students with impairments in secondary and tertiary education affects their ability to gain employment. Statistics New Zealand reported in 2001 that of those over 15 years living in households only 40% of people with impairments were employed, compared to 70% for those without impairments. People with impairments, therefore, are less likely to be in employment, with the proportion employed decreasing with increasing impairments. This trend and that relating to income also reflects what is occurring for Māori with impairments.

The fact that so many people with impairments are out of work is an international problem, causing spiralling welfare costs and productivity loss in many countries. The World Bank estimates that the annual loss of GDP globally due to long-term and short-term impairments is between US$1.37 - 1.94 trillion.

It does not make economic sense to allow the continuation of barriers that prevent people with impairments gaining access to tertiary education and achieving academic success. If these barriers are not resolved the investment in education, training and supporting people with impairments will be wasted. Instead of contributing to society, many people with impairments will receive benefits. The potential loss of income and the economic and social cost will be significant.

The 2001 New Zealand Disability Survey can be a useful tool for planning. An overview of this survey is available, using the following resources:

  1. Statistics New Zealand. 2002. Disability Counts Report.
  2. Statistics New Zealand website
[next - 4.2]   [previous - 3.13]   [contents]
FOOTNOTES
15. Statistics New Zealand. (2002). Disability counts 2001 report. Wellington, New Zealand: Statistics New Zealand. pp. 15-18, 26, 54-55, 66. [return to footnote 15 in main text]
16. Ministry of Health. (1998). Disability in New Zealand: Overview of the 1996/97 surveys. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Health. pp. 46, 47, 50, 90, 169. [return to footnote 116 in main text]
17. Ministry of Education. (2001). Ministry of Education Report on the special supplementary grants, 1999-2001. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education. [return to footnote 17 in main text]
18. International Labour Organization. (2001). Draft Code of Practice on managing disability in the workplace. Geneva: International Labour Office. p. viii. [return to footnote 18 in main text]
19. State Services Commission. (December 2001). Public service as an employer of choice research project: Improving the effectiveness of recruitment and retention for policy graduates with disability in the public service. Wellington, New Zealand: State Services Commission. [return to footnote 19 in main text]
20. Ministry of Education. (2003). Participation in tertiary education 2003. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education. pp. 32-33. [return to footnote 20 in main text]
21. Information about the number of students with impairments was collected by the Ministry of Education while information about the number of people with disabilities is from the 2001 New Zealand Disability Survey, by Statistics New Zealand. Because of the different survey instruments and definitions used, the participation rates are estimates only. [return to footnote 21 in main text]